Cyber Security

New Glowworm attack recovers device’s sound from LED Indicator


A new attack method leverages optical emanations from a device’s power indicator LED to recover sounds from connected peripherals and spy on electronic conversations from a distance of as much as 35 meters.

The findings of the new attack technique dubbed the “Glowworm attack,” were published by a group of academics from the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. They describe the method as “an optical TEMPEST attack that can be used by eavesdroppers to recover sound by analyzing optical measurements obtained via an electro-optical sensor directed at the power indicator LED of various devices.”

The experimental setup includes an optical-audio transformation (OAT) that allows for retrieving sound by isolating the speech from the optical measurements obtained by directing an electro-optical sensor at the device’s power indicator LED.

TEMPEST is the codename for unintentional intelligence-bearing emanations produced by electronic and electromechanical information-processing equipment. Glowworm builds on a similar attack called Lamphone which the same researchers demonstrated last year and enables the recovery of sound from a victim’s room that contains an overhead hanging bulb.

Even though both methods retrieve sound from light via an electro-optical sensor, they are also different in that while the Lamphone attack “is a side-channel attack that exploits a light bulb’s miniscule vibrations, which are the result of sound waves hitting the bulb,” Glowworm is a “TEMPEST attack that exploits the way that electrical circuits were designed. It can recover sound from devices like USB hub splitters that do not move in response to the acoustic information played by the speakers.”

The attack links on the optical correlation between the sound that is played by connected speakers and the intensity of their power indicator LED, which are not only connected directly to the power line but also that the intensity of a device’s power indicator LED is influenced by the power consumption. The quality of the sound recovered is proportional to the quality of the equipment used by the eavesdropper.

In a real-world scenario, the threat model takes aim at the speech generated by participants in a virtual meeting platform such as Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, with the malicious party located in a room in an adjacent building, enabling the adversary to recover sound from the power indicator LED of the speakers.

In case of an indirect attack scenario where the power indicator LED isn’t visible from outside the room, the eavesdropper can recover sound from the power indicator LED of the device used to provide the power to the speaker.

These kinds of attacks can be countered on the consumer side by placing a black tape over a device’s power indicator LED. But the researchers recommend device manufacturers to integrate a capacitor or an operational amplifier to eliminate the power consumption fluctuations that occur when the speakers produce sound.

The researchers stated that even though the cost of the countermeasures might seem negligible, as the devices are mass produced, the addition of a component to prevent the attack could cost manufacturer millions of dollars. However due to the cost-driven nature of consumers and the profit-driven nature of manufacturers, known vulnerabilities are usually ignored as a means of reducing costs. This may lead to many electrical circuits vulnerable to Glowworm attack for years to come.

Image Credits : Nuts & Volts Magazine

Priyanka R
Cyber Security Enthusiast, Security Blogger, Technical Editor, Author at Cyber Safe News

    Hackers uses Morse code in phishing attacks to hide detection

    Previous article

    Hacker claims to steal data of 100 million T-mobile customers

    Next article

    You may also like


    Leave a reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *